Let's talk

Why we stopped building WordPress sites for most clients

4 MIN READ TIME

Kim Green

by Kim Green

Development Director

27 May 2026

We moved away from WordPress because we wanted to build smarter websites, faster by default, and capable of having real AI built in with genuine business context. The architecture that once made WordPress flexible started working against us. The client concern about lock-in is still real, but easier to address than it's ever been.

We built WordPress sites for years. I'm not going to pretend we were reluctant converts… we are good at it. We were using Timber to separate the templating from the logic so builds were cleaner, and we'd developed a solid ACF-based block system so clients could fully manage their own content without breaking things and it worked.

weathered WordPress disc

But I always hated the architecture underneath. The plugin ecosystem in particular, a messy sea of dependencies, each one a potential conflict, a performance hit, a security risk. We spent a lot of time stripping plugins back out of client sites we'd inherited. The better we got at WordPress, the more we were compensating for its weaknesses rather than building on its strengths.

The move to a component-based stack was a natural progression from where we already were. If you're building flexible content blocks in ACF, you're already thinking in components you're just doing it in a much less elegant environment. When we started working with Sanity and Next.js, the logic carried straight over. The difference was that everything underneath it was cleaner, faster, and more purposeful.

Performance was my main reason for making the jump. Not in an abstract sense, in the sense that a WordPress site with a reasonable plugin load is fighting against itself from the start, and there's a ceiling on what you can achieve without significant ongoing maintenance. The sites we build now are faster by default, not by effort.

But the bigger reason was where we wanted to take things. We wanted to build AI into our sites that had real business context, not generic chatbots, but tools that understand your content, your services, your customers. We've already done that with our analytics tools built into Sanity — and WordPress recently released MCP capability, I think they'll get there eventually, but the architecture isn't built for it. We wanted to build it in now, not bolt it on later.

The question we still get asked

The thing that kept us on WordPress longer than we probably should have stayed was client anxiety. "What happens if you go away? Who'll manage the site?" It's a fair question and we still hear it when we're showing our new tech stack to our clients. Our answer: you own everything. Your content, your codebase, your data. If you wanted to take it to another developer tomorrow, you could.

That used to feel like a harder sell than it does now. More developers are working across different tech stacks, partly because AI tooling makes it easier to get up to speed quickly. The barrier to "what if I need someone else" is lower than it's ever been. We think that makes the switch easier to justify than it was two years ago.

We still maintain a handful of WordPress sites for existing clients and we're not going anywhere on that. But for new builds, we're not going back. The gap between what we can offer on our current stack and what we could offer on WordPress is too wide.

Key Takeaways

  • A plugin-heavy WordPress site is constantly compensating performance, security, and flexibility all suffer
  • Component-based thinking (ACF blocks, Timber) was the right instinct; we just needed a stack that was built for it
  • The real reason we left: we wanted AI woven into our sites, not bolted on later
  • Clients own everything on our current stack — content, code, data — and can take it elsewhere if needed
  • The "what if you go away" concern matters less now that AI tooling makes it easier for any developer to work across stacks

We're not anti-WordPress we spent years making it work and we understand why it's still the default for a lot of clients. But there's a difference between a platform that can do something and one that's built for it. The web is getting smarter fast, and we'd rather be building for that than spending our energy on workarounds.

Kim Green

by Kim Green

Development Director

27 May 2026

The Silent Pact

Every time you read something helpful or just down right enjoyable, you promise to share it with a peer and subscribe to our Creative Insider.

By clicking 'sign up', you agree to our terms. We only send an email or two a month, unsubscribe anytime.